<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Radio &#8211; Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/</link>
	<description>Pro Cycling News, Commentary and Special Features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Radio-Free Classics &#124; Cyclocosm - Pro Cycling Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-22958</link>
		<dc:creator>The Radio-Free Classics &#124; Cyclocosm - Pro Cycling Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22958</guid>
		<description>[...] no secret I&#8217;m pro-radio. But not because I&#8217;m an ideologue in the vein of a Johan Bruyneel, or because I&#8217;m a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no secret I&#8217;m pro-radio. But not because I&#8217;m an ideologue in the vein of a Johan Bruyneel, or because I&#8217;m a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-15043</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15043</guid>
		<description>Disagree with the article - there&#039;s a lot of complete irrelevance in there - I mean what have lighter bikes and sponsor support got to do with it ?

I think racing is more sterile than it was - and I think radios are part of that.   It&#039;s true that the DS has always communicated with the rider but not in such an immediate and continuous way.  Ban radios and let&#039;s see what happens  - if the racing doesn&#039;t improve or it gets worse well then we can always go back can&#039;t we.   

The conservative ones are those that refuse to experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree with the article &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot of complete irrelevance in there &#8211; I mean what have lighter bikes and sponsor support got to do with it ?</p>
<p>I think racing is more sterile than it was &#8211; and I think radios are part of that.   It&#8217;s true that the DS has always communicated with the rider but not in such an immediate and continuous way.  Ban radios and let&#8217;s see what happens  &#8211; if the racing doesn&#8217;t improve or it gets worse well then we can always go back can&#8217;t we.   </p>
<p>The conservative ones are those that refuse to experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyclocosm &#8211; Pro Cycling Blog &#187; The Four Impossibilities of Radio-Free Racing</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-11372</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyclocosm &#8211; Pro Cycling Blog &#187; The Four Impossibilities of Radio-Free Racing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11372</guid>
		<description>[...] not like I haven&#8217;t covered this before, but I feel I ought to touch again on the radio issue. With two stages of this year&#8217;s Tour de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not like I haven&#8217;t covered this before, but I feel I ought to touch again on the radio issue. With two stages of this year&#8217;s Tour de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyclocosm - Pro Cycling Blog &#187; Was LBL that Great? More Puerto News.</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyclocosm - Pro Cycling Blog &#187; Was LBL that Great? More Puerto News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>[...] crowded final kilometers. Some folks blame the weather, others are going back after it with banning the radios. I&#8217;m the sort that&#8217;ll chalk it up to the advent of the ProTour; it stocks the start [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crowded final kilometers. Some folks blame the weather, others are going back after it with banning the radios. I&#8217;m the sort that&#8217;ll chalk it up to the advent of the ProTour; it stocks the start [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mags</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>mags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Well said Cosmo!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Mags&lt;BR/&gt;http://roadrace1.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Cosmo!</p>
<p>Mags<br /><a href="http://roadrace1.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://roadrace1.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hulkster</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2005/12/no-radio-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>hulkster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-398</guid>
		<description>In &quot;A Day Without A Mexican,&quot; California falls to shit when all the Mexicans in California disappear.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Likewise, without radios, might bike racing fall apart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &#8220;A Day Without A Mexican,&#8221; California falls to shit when all the Mexicans in California disappear.  </p>
<p>Likewise, without radios, might bike racing fall apart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

