<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dope&#8217;s On You: The Missing ProTour Revision</title>
	<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/</link>
	<description>Pro Cycling News, Commentary and Special Features</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2542</link>
		<author>sam</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2542</guid>
					<description>sorry for the off-topic comment, but i noticed during last year's and this year's tour de france that all cyclists wore helmets on every stage, but if you watch highlights of previous tours (even lance's most recent wins), most riders didn't wear helmets on the climbing stages.  

was there a new rule enacted requiring helmets at all times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the off-topic comment, but i noticed during last year&#8217;s and this year&#8217;s tour de france that all cyclists wore helmets on every stage, but if you watch highlights of previous tours (even lance&#8217;s most recent wins), most riders didn&#8217;t wear helmets on the climbing stages.  </p>
<p>was there a new rule enacted requiring helmets at all times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciaccmo</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2547</link>
		<author>ciaccmo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2547</guid>
					<description>where have you been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where have you been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Walters</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2551</link>
		<author>Troy Walters</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2551</guid>
					<description>Sam, you're at the wrong blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, you&#8217;re at the wrong blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2554</link>
		<author>colin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2554</guid>
					<description>In other words... yes.

And even during Lance's run I believe the rule was that they could only lose the helmets on the final climb to a mountaintop finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words&#8230; yes.</p>
<p>And even during Lance&#8217;s run I believe the rule was that they could only lose the helmets on the final climb to a mountaintop finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2558</link>
		<author>sam</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2558</guid>
					<description>thanks colin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks colin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spokejunky</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2559</link>
		<author>spokejunky</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2559</guid>
					<description>Helmets must be worn at all times except for ITT:

http://www.uci.ch/imgArchive/Rules/1gene-E.pdf

Section 1.3.031

Gotta get my underwear at K-Mart, Judge Wopner at 4 o'clock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helmets must be worn at all times except for ITT:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uci.ch/imgArchive/Rules/1gene-E.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.uci.ch/imgArchive/Rules/1gene-E.pdf</a></p>
<p>Section 1.3.031</p>
<p>Gotta get my underwear at K-Mart, Judge Wopner at 4 o&#8217;clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyne</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2561</link>
		<author>lyne</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2561</guid>
					<description>Rule stating that helmets had to be worn at all times removing the clause about the last kms on a climb was changed in 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule stating that helmets had to be worn at all times removing the clause about the last kms on a climb was changed in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmo</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2564</link>
		<author>Cosmo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2564</guid>
					<description>Adding to this ridiculous aside, I think it's a real bummer they scratched the rule that let you ride casqueless for the final 5km of a climb. I'm a serious helmet proponent (very, &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; rare that I ever ride without one), but the images of bareheaded cyclists battling the final pitches of a long climb are some of the most compelling in the sport.

I just can't see a final 5km crash causing serious head trauma. I suppose it &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; still happen, but I feel like the "helmets all the way" rule is more a product of helmet makers wanting more TV time, and overinfluential team managers not wanting to keep track of their riders' lids during the most critical moments of every mountain stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding to this ridiculous aside, I think it&#8217;s a real bummer they scratched the rule that let you ride casqueless for the final 5km of a climb. I&#8217;m a serious helmet proponent (very, <i>very</i> rare that I ever ride without one), but the images of bareheaded cyclists battling the final pitches of a long climb are some of the most compelling in the sport.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t see a final 5km crash causing serious head trauma. I suppose it <i>could</i> still happen, but I feel like the &#8220;helmets all the way&#8221; rule is more a product of helmet makers wanting more TV time, and overinfluential team managers not wanting to keep track of their riders&#8217; lids during the most critical moments of every mountain stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2567</link>
		<author>sam</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2567</guid>
					<description>cosmo, sorry for the offtopic comments, i realize i should have posted this elsewhere.  feel free to delete.

-sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cosmo, sorry for the offtopic comments, i realize i should have posted this elsewhere.  feel free to delete.</p>
<p>-sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2568</link>
		<author>Sebastian</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2568</guid>
					<description>Long live the tangent!  There were occasional attempts to institute helmet laws in the 90s.  I recall a stage in the 1991 Tour when some riders wore fedoras and leather Kangol caps in order to mockingly exploit a loophole in an ordinance that had just been passed.  (You'll have to translate French Wikipedia to get the full story on that.)  In 2003 they passed an almost-universal helmet rule -- you had to wear them except for the last 5 Ks of a mountaintop finish -- after Andrei Kivilev's death in Paris-Nice.  In 2005 the exception was scrapped, and thus the photo of Valverde beating Armstrong to the top of Courchevel that year shows both in helmets (vs. Basso and Armstrong at La Mongie the year before).

I agree wholeheartedly with Cosmo that the last-5K exception was great because it preserved one of the sport's most photogenic competitions, the battle to the top of a col.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long live the tangent!  There were occasional attempts to institute helmet laws in the 90s.  I recall a stage in the 1991 Tour when some riders wore fedoras and leather Kangol caps in order to mockingly exploit a loophole in an ordinance that had just been passed.  (You&#8217;ll have to translate French Wikipedia to get the full story on that.)  In 2003 they passed an almost-universal helmet rule &#8212; you had to wear them except for the last 5 Ks of a mountaintop finish &#8212; after Andrei Kivilev&#8217;s death in Paris-Nice.  In 2005 the exception was scrapped, and thus the photo of Valverde beating Armstrong to the top of Courchevel that year shows both in helmets (vs. Basso and Armstrong at La Mongie the year before).</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly with Cosmo that the last-5K exception was great because it preserved one of the sport&#8217;s most photogenic competitions, the battle to the top of a col.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cycling Beat &#187; You Can&#8217;t Beat Cycling Blogs</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2587</link>
		<author>Cycling Beat &#187; You Can&#8217;t Beat Cycling Blogs</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclocosm.com/2007/08/the-dopes-on-you-the-missing-protour-revision/#comment-2587</guid>
					<description>[...] on the preponderence of tainted or suspect athletes in the Continental Tour teams, Cyclocosm has pointed out just where some questionable riders have disappeared to in his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on the preponderence of tainted or suspect athletes in the Continental Tour teams, Cyclocosm has pointed out just where some questionable riders have disappeared to in his [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
