<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Different Kind of Retrospective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/</link>
	<description>Pro Cycling News, Commentary and Special Features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-11373</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1392#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>Colin- thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin- thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainbow</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-11364</link>
		<dc:creator>rainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1392#comment-11364</guid>
		<description>Whatever the format of the material is published in is immaterial. What’s more important is to have the original files to work with. pfd, png, jpg, dumbdiddlyd  it won’t make it manipulatble (do not read changeable, but rather to have ability to be graphed and ranged compared against other results to get a better perspective of the data). The data we are reading is dumb data and not really interpolatable in the formats provided, it’s the truth without repercussion.
I’m still waiting to see Lance’s promised comprehensive  independent drug-testing program the BEST the world has ever seen yada yada yada. Whatever happened to that? Cost! What? Who are we talking about here? Logistics! Ha? Just follow the twitter, flapping feeds! It doesn’t take a genius to take blood. The most tested athlete of all time needs to compiled all the tests and have them released. that would prove his point. What’s so special about just 2009? Or would that cost him too much and test our credulity to beyond belief?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever the format of the material is published in is immaterial. What’s more important is to have the original files to work with. pfd, png, jpg, dumbdiddlyd  it won’t make it manipulatble (do not read changeable, but rather to have ability to be graphed and ranged compared against other results to get a better perspective of the data). The data we are reading is dumb data and not really interpolatable in the formats provided, it’s the truth without repercussion.<br />
I’m still waiting to see Lance’s promised comprehensive  independent drug-testing program the BEST the world has ever seen yada yada yada. Whatever happened to that? Cost! What? Who are we talking about here? Logistics! Ha? Just follow the twitter, flapping feeds! It doesn’t take a genius to take blood. The most tested athlete of all time needs to compiled all the tests and have them released. that would prove his point. What’s so special about just 2009? Or would that cost him too much and test our credulity to beyond belief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin R</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-11358</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1392#comment-11358</guid>
		<description>Al -- JPGs use lossy compression which makes text look like crap.  PNGs are lossless, so your text stays crisp.    WOO I&#039;M A DORK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al &#8212; JPGs use lossy compression which makes text look like crap.  PNGs are lossless, so your text stays crisp.    WOO I&#8217;M A DORK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-11357</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1392#comment-11357</guid>
		<description>Nice note on VeloNews making pages more &#039;findable.&#039;  I use Bing to Google now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice note on VeloNews making pages more &#8216;findable.&#8217;  I use Bing to Google now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/06/a-different-kind-of-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-11356</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1392#comment-11356</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;charts should be saved as PNGs, not JPGs&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

What is the reason for that?  I&#039;m curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;charts should be saved as PNGs, not JPGs&#8221;</i></p>
<p>What is the reason for that?  I&#8217;m curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

