More Proof the ProTour is Bunk

Jul 7 2009

Yeah, BBox Bouygues Telecom—now there’s a top tier bunch. Light years beyond LPR, that’s for sure.

bbox
(via @alexfeel)

Possibly related content:

Paris-Nice, Milan-Turin, ProTour Debate Goes On Man, I gotta stop taking these weekend junkets around New England; it’s cutting down on productivity. It is, also, however, streamlining my posts dramatically. For example, I have to cut...
Pro Cycling News – No Grand Tours in ProTour, Armstrong Speaks Yes, so I’m stuck in Williamstown, digging out from a modest snowfall and not going to ‘cross nationals. So sad. Mercifully, fortune has provided me with some interesting news to...
Thinning the ProTour Herd? So here’s a shocker – Unibet is pulling its sponsorship of a pro cycling team. Combine that with the impending loss of Astana’s ProTour license (even the manager has confessed...

10 Responses to “More Proof the ProTour is Bunk”

  1. Frankielof July 7, 2009 at 12:04 pm #

    They showed this several times on Vs. this morning and it was obvious that the first rider rode right into the gravel on the edge of the road coming out of this corner. At that point the rest were following him down. The root cause of this is the French teams are all be assured a slot in the Tour each year so they don’t really need to go out and build a team that has a realistic chance of doing anything other than the daily doomed break. What’s crazy is that the annual cost to run a mediocre team like B-Box or AG2R is not much less that a team like Columbia.

  2. Diarmuid July 7, 2009 at 1:02 pm #

    FFS The reason LPR was not invited is that their team leader epitomizes everything pro cycling should be trying to distance themselves from. Compare them to Skil Shimano who gave L’Hotelliere the boot after his suspicious performances. I know who I’d prefer to see in a race and I’m happy that the ASO agree

  3. Spino July 7, 2009 at 2:03 pm #

    To be fair, Gustaf Larsson almost bailed on that corner as well. Crashes are inevitable, especially on a golf cart road like that. Nevertheless, this post makes me laugh.

  4. cosmo July 7, 2009 at 2:47 pm #

    Diarmuid, if you’re speaking about DiLuca, he was investigated and sanctioned according the rules cycling’s governing bodies have set up. His suspension ended in 2007. On the road, DiLuca is an exciting competitor, and I can’t think of a race that’s been worse because he’s raced it.

    Then there’s Petacchi, who was suspended a year for breaking an arbitrarily determined limit on a substance with no performance enhancing effect. He’s performance in the Giro was excellent, and deserved as much as any other rider, to be contesting sprints at this years Tour.

    Skil-Shimano earned an entry to the TdF based on their performance this spring. BBox, however, earned an invite by putting down a $1 million Euros in bank guarantees to be a UCI Pro Tour squad. That’s the major reason why, as Frankielof notes, costs are nearly identical across teams.

  5. Josh July 7, 2009 at 2:47 pm #

    I can’t tell if this is all tongue in cheek or a deep foray into the territory of drawing overly broad conclusions from a micro-slice of information.

  6. cosmo July 7, 2009 at 2:49 pm #

    Not entirely serious, but it is emblematic of the current ProTour structure’s inability to put the best riders into the best races—one of the primary things it was intended to do.

  7. Frankielof July 7, 2009 at 4:34 pm #

    I couldn’t agree more Cosmo. Say what you may about the ASO/RAI/Unipublic “mafia”, they own what makes this sport what it is. The ProTour, or whatever is is called these days, and it creator the UCI have “lost the plot”. When will they realize that what they have created has done nothing for the sport? And how long until the fragile truce that was agreed to this year falls apart?

  8. juan July 7, 2009 at 6:33 pm #

    Doesn’t ‘French cycling’ have a bigger problem of not cultivating strong riders, rather than it being an issue of whether a team can front the cash to be a protour team? While the French may have some specific deficiencies, a genetic inability to cycle cannot be one of them.

    As far as DiLuca- three months, right? Pretty rough sanction.

    I’m not sure that statement about the asthma drug is quite correct- I think it is a performance enhancer.

    And your saying that the costs across all teams is the same? Really? Salaries are the same for Mark Cavendish as for Fumiyuki Beppu?

  9. DJ July 8, 2009 at 2:11 pm #

    It seems your blog is being read in France…strong revenge by Voeckler today ;-)

  10. cosmo July 8, 2009 at 2:13 pm #

    It was a classy win indeed. I’d be flattered if this post was part of his motivation.

Leave a Reply