<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WADA&#8217;s 8-Year-Snitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyclocosm.com/2009/07/wadas-8-year-snitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/07/wadas-8-year-snitch/</link>
	<description>Pro Cycling News, Commentary and Special Features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyclocosm &#8211; Pro Cycling Blog &#187; What Thomas Dekker Says About The ProTour</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/07/wadas-8-year-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-13660</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyclocosm &#8211; Pro Cycling Blog &#187; What Thomas Dekker Says About The ProTour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1407#comment-13660</guid>
		<description>[...] course against him—if anything, more people should be considering that retroactive dope testing severely reduces rider incentive to go straight, instead of leaping into snide Twitter tirades against those found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course against him—if anything, more people should be considering that retroactive dope testing severely reduces rider incentive to go straight, instead of leaping into snide Twitter tirades against those found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmg</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/07/wadas-8-year-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-11385</link>
		<dc:creator>jmg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1407#comment-11385</guid>
		<description>How, exactly, would a two-year window of retroactive testing be more likely to reform current dopers? I don&#039;t see an argument in there and just want some clarification. 

I also don&#039;t see the room for abuse. Well, I see room for abuse, but it doesn&#039;t seem any greater when the window is eight years rather than two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How, exactly, would a two-year window of retroactive testing be more likely to reform current dopers? I don&#8217;t see an argument in there and just want some clarification. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see the room for abuse. Well, I see room for abuse, but it doesn&#8217;t seem any greater when the window is eight years rather than two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://cyclocosm.com/2009/07/wadas-8-year-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-11384</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclocosm.com/?p=1407#comment-11384</guid>
		<description>Great points all around.  The timing of the announcement is, uh, convenient.  And Dekker&#039;s results this year have been a disappointment compared to previous years.  I thought he might be trying to fit in with his new teammates. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points all around.  The timing of the announcement is, uh, convenient.  And Dekker&#8217;s results this year have been a disappointment compared to previous years.  I thought he might be trying to fit in with his new teammates. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.144 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-06 07:38:59 -->
