A Periodic Table of Professional Cycling

With the UCI ProTour now extending from January through October, it’s getting a little hard to keep track of the where and when surrounding various professional events.

Well, struggle no more: Cyclocosm.com proudly presents our Periodic Table of Professional Cycling—and thanks to Operation Monetize, you can buy it (and any of our other graphics) as a poster. It’s inspired some t-shirts as well.





[clickthrough for big sizes]

Races are ordered from top-to-bottom in rough order of importance, with vertical series representing geographic location of events. Stage races tend toward the left side of the table, one-days toward the right, and colors correspond with UCI ranking of individual events.

Races that haven’t been run yet, or couldn’t be shoehorned in elsewhere ended up in the Lanthaniods, while recently-defunct events filled the Actinoids. Each event tile contains the name of the event, the year in which it was first run, a rough measure of its distance in stages or kilometers, and a symbolic abbreviation.

Event abbreviations are mostly three characters because it’s easier to parse (and you won’t need to write equations with them). They’re designed to make intuitive sense, but occasionally reflect an older, alternative, or native-language name of a given event.

Obviously, there were a few concessions made to fit the design (World Championships in the Netherlands, Tour de Suisse above the Tour of Romandie), and I promoted the Tour of California to ProTour status, both for aesthetics and as a matter of opinion. Here are my sources, and if you disagree, here’s the public domain source file so you can make your own.

19 Comments »

19 Responses to “A Periodic Table of Professional Cycling”

  1. andmujika on 25 Jan 2010 at 8:00 am #

    Vuelta al País Vasco and Volta Catalunya should be switched.

  2. cosmo on 25 Jan 2010 at 8:57 am #

    That was another toss-up for me, like Tour of Romandie vs. Tour de Suisse. Both top-level events, both with very high quality fields, historically speaking. I think what eventually put Catalunya on top was that it was first run in 1911, vs 1924 for the Basque Country.

    Of course, the chart lists both of the races as 1911…typo #1, I guess.

  3. parco mantani on 25 Jan 2010 at 9:19 am #

    Strictly speaking the Tour of Ireland and the Ras are different races

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tour_of_Ireland

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBD_Insurance_Ras

  4. Al on 25 Jan 2010 at 9:35 am #

    Thanks for my new wallpaper

  5. Andrew Hayward on 25 Jan 2010 at 9:40 am #

    Great poster. Unfortunately, you spelt Bordeaux wrong in the ‘Boreaux-Paris’ race (1891-1988) bottom left.

    Unless of course there’s another famous French race with a similar name running between the same dates that I’m not aware of.

  6. cosmo on 25 Jan 2010 at 9:52 am #

    Nope. Definitely spelled it wrong. Typo #2…

  7. Andrew Bernstein on 25 Jan 2010 at 10:16 am #

    Umm… where is Tour of the Battenkill? I must have missed it on there.

  8. Lauren G. on 25 Jan 2010 at 10:38 am #

    This may be the nerdiest accomplishment of your life. I am so proud of you!

  9. dave on 25 Jan 2010 at 11:39 am #

    is my glossy new poster going to be fraught with typos? does that make it a extra-collectible first-edition?

  10. Nice on 26 Jan 2010 at 4:39 am #

    Tour of Ireland =/= The Rás.

  11. Eddy on 26 Jan 2010 at 1:33 pm #

    Yes, Battenkill seems to be missing. Too bad. Hope you haven’t printed them yet…

  12. Liam on 27 Jan 2010 at 3:36 pm #

    Battenkill hasn’t proven itself yet, needs another couple years. Wait and see how the pro race is.

  13. Sebastian on 27 Jan 2010 at 5:50 pm #

    Nice work — and congrats on being picked up by Pez again! But other matters demand your urgent attention:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-MWN-XUtEQ

  14. Bill on 27 Jan 2010 at 6:01 pm #

    I think you should have grouped the notable and defunct events by country but, otherwise, Mendeleev would be pleased.

  15. Looking back: The good, the bad and the pretty | Browne Eye on 30 Jan 2010 at 12:56 pm #

    [...] of chemistry classes and is a well known bike dork, I’m mad at myself for not creating the Periodic Table of Professional Cycling that Cyclocosm also created. He has taken all the major, and not so major races, and broke them [...]

  16. Gary Premo on 09 Feb 2010 at 12:31 am #

    The final year of the San Francisco Grand Prix was 2005, not 2004. The website can still be accessed to this day http://www.sanfrangrandprix.com/index_content.asp

  17. Periodic Table of Professional Cycling at RYN SHANE-ARMSTRONG: FOUND MEDIA on 12 Feb 2010 at 6:23 pm #

    [...] Cyclocosm Flickr Trackosaurusrex [...]

  18. John the Monkey on 16 Feb 2010 at 4:51 am #

    To expand slightly on what “Nice” says, the Tour of Ireland and the FBD Ras are different races;

    The Ras;
    http://www.fbdinsuranceras.com/event/

    The Tour of Ireland
    http://www.tourofireland.ie/index.php

    Other than that, the table is fantastic – topping my previous favourite Cyclocosm infographic (“Calculate your Jens Factor”) with an ease I’d have thought impossible. Great stuff.

  19. Science + Cycling = « Beeston Cycling Club on 16 Feb 2010 at 10:01 pm #

    [...] http://cyclocosm.com/2010/01/a-periodic-table-of-professional-cycling/ [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply