I’d love to say I told you so, but check out the date “published” and date “updated” in this shot. If Cyclingnews is no longer bound by the laws of time and space, can we still trust their reporting?
Also, note that it only says Sky expected to announce a signing. It doesn’t say whether that announcement will be accurate.
Since the BBC’s cycling coverage is basically all Wiggins all the time, here you go
https://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/8397628.stm
Wot? Term SKY , you woosh to rode the tour de Fronce, but you are onglish, miss u r.
Your objective is to have a brotish tour de France winner in five years? no. U ear re gont brutish twot!
To win, first you have to arrive, to arrive you first have to start the race. O riv wire. Toxt me in sex yors. C.P.
What you guys must understand is that the article was published on the Australia end and then updated it later with new details from London – you haven’t taken the time factor into account.