Tour de France '07 – A Hopefully Truthful Race

Jul 28 2007

So that was a pretty good TT. Leipheimer riding like a man possessed, Cadel Evans looking like a wounded beast, and Contador feeding Evans slack the whole way, knowing all along that he had plenty to give. In the end, the Top 3 remained unchanged, but the tight time gaps (:31 between first and third) made for some dramatic finishes.

I thought Levi might just have been on form to slip by both Evans and Contador, but the post-race interviews revealed the same old Leipheimer, with quotes along the lines of “yeah, I was going fast so I could ease up in the corners”; “you know, I really just got to relax and enjoy it”; and “Cadel won’t have to worry. I won’t try to get those last 9 seconds tomorrow”. Now you know why Armstrong choose to ride behind Contador instead.

Anyway, pre-race, there were the usual tech stories, checking out a few of the badass TT bikes, or critiquing chrono positions in the least aerodynamic prose ever (I realize Zinn literally wrote the book on bike tech, but please, someone get him an editor). But I was sad to see that no one wrote anything on the tech topics I want to hear about, like Millar’s sweet disintegrating disc wheel, or how the Tour was able to determine they should slap three seconds onto Contador’s finish time yesterday.

Maybe the journos who were supposed to write those stories up got a little sidetracked yesterday. Can you just see some overly-jovial Danish newspaperman being like “another positive? Police raids? Hell no! Only story here is you jokers got Punk’d!”. You think the Danish press would have learned their lesson after that whole Mohammed thing. Of course, even if those reporters hadn’t been otherwise occupied, they’d probably write it up with some pathtically ambiguous title; was the Tour marred by doping? Or was it the time trial?

Not that the press cares about such matters. They don’t even take the time to correct Dick Pound by pointing out that ineffective drug testing wouldn’t result in any positive tests. Or to mention to Christian Prudhomme that if the UCI really didn’t want a clean Tour, they could have saved themselves time and money by simply not doing any drug tests. Am I the only one out here who’s bothered by the fact that the only organization actually catching cheats is getting a lot of flack for actually catching cheats?

(report this ad)

4 Responses to “Tour de France '07 – A Hopefully Truthful Race”

  1. Guy 28 July 2007 at 7:21 pm #

    anyone reading the belgium report`s got punked!! Levi I was so in your corner today I wanted your 33 year old ass to beat this kid!! God please act like your pissed that it did not happen you rode your ass off, you had tenure and Lance rode in his car, what the F!!

  2. Guy 28 July 2007 at 7:23 pm #

    Whoa whoa Imean the danish!!

  3. AG 29 July 2007 at 2:25 pm #

    Cosmo- thanks for the fine coverage. Your posts are always a nice bit of catharsis- without them, I’d be (dick) pounding my head against the computer screen every time another lunatic doping story surfaces. One request: after watching his befuddled (though well-meaning) rants on, maybe you could give your URL to David Millar. That poor guy just needs an outlet. Finally, since you’re facing some slow cycling news time, can you bring back bikes v. the world. I’m thinking Levi L. vs. Levi Strauss and company- both are buttoned up, both faded, etc. Thanks again –

  4. dailytri 30 July 2007 at 9:37 am #

    You raise a great point about how catching cheats has generated nothing but flack throughout the tour. But I think the flack generated is caused by the simple fact that this much cheating has gone on “undetected” or “unreported” until now. That the cycling universe is now, finally, attempting to stop all forms of cheating is going to be a constant source of news until cheating has been eradicated from the sport.

Leave a Reply